суббота, 15 октября 2011 г.

The Impact Of Rituxan For The Treatment Of Follicular Lymphoma

The Impact Of Rituxan For The Treatment Of Follicular Lymphoma.

New fact-finding provides more substantiation that treating set lymphoma patients with an up-market panacea over the long term helps them go longer without symptoms. But the drug, called rituximab (Rituxan), does not seem to significantly growth fixation span, raising questions about whether it's significance taking. People with lymphoma who are account maintenance treatment "really emergency a discussion with their oncologist," said Dr Steven T Rosen, leader of the Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center at Northwestern University in Chicago sudan herbal shop. The ruminate on complicated ancestors with follicular lymphoma, one of the milder forms of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a duration that refers to cancers of the exempt system.

Though it can be fatal, most kinfolk live for at least 10 years after diagnosis. There has been reflect over whether people with the disease should take hold Rituxan as maintenance therapy after their initial chemotherapy. In the study, which was funded in constituent by F Hoffmann-La Roche, a pharmaceutical gathering that sells Rituxan, crudely half of the 1019 participants took Rituxan, and the others did not apotik jual cytotec. All beforehand had infatuated the drug right after receiving chemotherapy.

In the next three years, the bone up found, bodies taking the drug took longer, on average, to show symptoms. Three-quarters of them made it to the three-year dent without progression of their illness, compared with about 58 percent of those who didn't gather the drug. But the expiry rate over three years remained about the same, according to the report, published online Dec 21 2010 in The Lancet.

The treatment "should now be considered as first-line therapy for these patients," wrote Dr Gilles Salles of Hospices Civils de Lyon & Universite Claude Bernard in Lyon, France, and his scrutiny colleagues. But Rosen said there's still a pit over use of the narcotize as subsistence therapy. "Physicians are falling into two groups," he said. "One says, 'There was no survival advantage, I'd just stoppage until you have extending and then sanctuary you.

That's not unreasonable'". Another troupe "would imagine that there's potentially better status of human during the space without disease," Rosen said. "But the philosophic benefits from not having any evidence of disease are stark to measure".

In a comment accompanying the report in The Lancet, Dr Jonathan Friedberg, of the hematology and oncology disagreement at the University of Rochester in Rochester, NY, wrote that "an division of cost-effectiveness would be very helpful. In an date of increased health-care costs, what help is life-or-death to justify the expense of this maintenance strategy, which at my institution would cost Medicare more than $60000 per patient?" Friedberg asked.

He also described as ill-timed the researchers' expression that continuation therapy with the drug should be prescribed for all people with follicular lymphoma who are initially treated with rituximab bonus chemotherapy glucotrol pills. "However, sustention is an option," Friedberg said, adding that "the investigators are to be congratulated for this prominent contribution and are strongly encouraged to last consolidation of these patients to answer the questions that remain".

Комментариев нет:

Отправить комментарий